| Rank | D/ST | Opp | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49ers | SEA | I have no faith in Russell Wilson, I don't care how many pretend "clutch" performances he rattles off. |
| 2 | Bears | DET | They score more points than a few offenses and Stafford the gunslinger (who I think will have a great week) will throw picks. |
| 3 | Packers | @STL | I'm not buying into this receiver-less offense with an aging "power" back who always looks like he's running uphill. |
| 4 | Cardinals | @MIN | There's just too many playmakers on the defense to ignore. Rookie QB plus Peterson's ailing. |
| 5 | Vikings | ARI | While I won't enjoy it, the Vikes will probably have anywhere from 7-32 sacks on Sunday. |
| 6 | Seahawks | @SF | Face it, the Niners will run a ton and they won't put up too many points. |
| 7 | Steelers | @CIN | Dalton gets sacked a lot and is prone to throwing picks. |
| 8 | Cowboys | @CAR | Newton is slumping to say the least and while he is dangerous, they won't score too much. |
| 9 | Texans | BAL | Flacco plays terribly on the road and if they contain Rice, that'll work in Houston's benefit. |
| 10 | Patriots | NYJ | I know, they made Russell Wilson look competent. But the Jets might play Tebow at RB. Come on. |
| 11 | Giants | WSH | That front 7 has to show up sometime and with all the trash talk from the G-Men, it better be this week. |
| 12 | Ravens | @HOU | Maybe they pull off an uber-inspired performance in Ray Lewis's honor. Scary matchup though. |
| 13 | Raiders | JAC | "Why are the Raiders this high?" you may ask. Well, A) Bye Week From Hell. B) It's the Jaguars. |
| 14 | Lions | @CHI | If they can minimize Marshall, Cutler may transform into the turnover machine he's become before. |
| 15 | Browns | @IND | This defense isn't that terrible and Luck still has no O-line. |
| 16 | Panthers | DAL | Felix Jones has fumble issues and Romo has had interception issues. |
| 17 | Bengals | PIT | They may rope in a few sacks and with a diminishing run game, Big Ben could force some throws. |
| 18 | Colts | CLE | They're not great but we'll have to see which Weeden shows up. |
| 19 | Rams | GB | If you're feeling risky, they'll certainly rattle off a few sacks. |
| 20 | Jets | @NE | In Foxboro, maybe a few sacks and a magical-Tom-Brady-intentional-grounding-safety is all they get. |
| 21 | Jaguars | @OAK | Palmer sometimes enjoys frequenting turnoverland. |
| 22 | Bills | TEN | I'm expecting a high-scoring game between the two of these literally defenseless teams. |
| 23 | Titans | @BUF | See above. |
| 24 | Redskins | @NYG | The defense isn't great and Eli's going to tear up the secondary. |
| 25 | Buccaneers | NO | This is going to be a shootout. Don't bother. |
| 26 | Saints | @TB | This is going to be a shootout. Don't bother. I don't know why you would anyway. |
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Week 7 Rankings: Defense/Special Teams Units
Is it just me or are defenses damn thin this week?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment